Best Watches Reviews

Social Navigation

The Battle of Luxury Daily Beaters Part 3 – Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra VS. Rolex Datejust, The Verdict!

The Battle of Luxury Daily Beaters Part 3 – Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra VS. Rolex Datejust, The Verdict!


In the terrific plan of things, watch gatherers are an uncommon animal groups and, whatever amount of we love you, don’t address by far most of men with regards to observe needs. Most men will in general fall in the one-watch classification. With regards to putting resources into an all-rounder bound to endure forever (and a few), there are two competitors you can’t neglect. Very particular device watches for explicit games will not glance directly in the office, and that super slight gold tuxedo watch will look pretty crazy during rugby training. It’s tied in with striking an equilibrium, finding a watch that works on the whole conditions and that will not allow you to down. For this Battle of the Luxury Daily Beaters we will pit two in number competitors. The three-hand-and-date Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m and the Rolex Datejust 41 are, in our eyes, flexibility in essence and offer an extremely fulfilling answer to the “one watch for all occasions” problem. Unequivocally coordinated in pretty much every perspective, we should investigate their essential measurements and check whether we can articulate a winner.

Editor’s Note: The photos of the Omega Aqua Terra were taken on Frank’s 18cm wrist and the Rolex Datejust on Brice’s 16.5cm wrist. So if it’s not too much trouble, think about this when looking at the pictures outlining this article.

Case Size and Presence on the wrist

Both models have a contemporary 41mm breadth and both have treated steel cases and metal wristbands. The instances of both the Aqua Terra and the Datejust are uncommonly very much gotten done with brushed and cleaned surfaces and the arm bands are completely incorporated into the case.

There are, be that as it may, recognizable contrasts in regards to the stature of the case; the Aqua Terra has a case thickness of 13.6mm while the Datejust is 11.8mm. That probably won’t appear to be a great deal on paper, however when seen in profile, you can truly value the distinction. The 2017 Datejust we have for this comparison profits by the new plan overhaul and has a marginally slimmer case, more tightened carries and a more slender bezel. The profile of the Datejust is less fatty, more ergonomic, emphatically more rich than before and sits delightfully on the wrist.

Despite the distinction on the off chance that stature, the two watches sit amazingly well on most wrist sizes (Aqua Terra on a 18cm wrist, Datejust on a 16.5cm). The tightened hauls of the Aqua Terra and the versatile end connections of the wristband permit the watch to sit flush against the wrist.

Another striking distinction is the white gold fluted bezel of the Datejust rather than the level cleaned steel bezel of the Aqua Terra. Inquisitively, the fluted bezel attracts the eye towards the focal point of the dial making the watch appear to be more compact and more modest than its 41mm would indicate.

The water-opposition of the Aqua Terra is 150m, and keeping in mind that the crown is in a bad way down, the caseback has a sapphire precious stone to see the development. The water-obstruction of the Datejust is 100m and the strong caseback and crown are in a bad way down.

Conclusion: Although the two watches share a similar 41mm measurement, the case thickness of the Datejust is perceptibly slimmer. The case completes are comparable yet the gold fluted bezel of the Datejust causes the watch to appear to be marginally more modest and more compact than the Aqua Terra. Water-obstruction is 50m higher in the Aqua Terra and for sure, the caseback offers a perspective on the development. The entirety of this gives a marginally more refined profile to the Rolex, while the Omega feels a smidgen more casual.

Dial Legibility

The dark dial of the Aqua Terra is brightened with the trademark teak decking of this assortment. The unpredictable decking adds interest and profundity to the dial and this dark model, specifically, comes across as more rich, exemplary and formal than a portion of its more beautiful counterparts.

The date window at 6 o’clock gets configuration signals from the vintage 1952 Seamaster Calendar that enlivened certain subtleties of this watch. The foundation shade of the date window coordinates the dark dial and the capacity mixes in attentively with the dial. Applied three-sided records with Super-LumiNova and exemplary Broad Arrow hands with brilliant tips complete the image. Be that as it may, when the splendidly cleaned rhodium-plated hands merged on the dial, they were difficult to distinguish.

The blue dial of the Datejust offers remarkable intelligibility consistently. The rectangular gold hour markers and the dull edged stick hands are treated with Rolex’s own brilliant material and discharge a durable blue shine. The date window at 3 o’clock, the capacity that the Datejust set up for life of horology, has a Cyclops amplifying lens.

Conclusion: Although the dials share comparable highlights, intelligibility is predominant on the Rolex Datejust. The dark decking of the Omega Aqua Terra makes this model come across as a marginally dressier, more conventional model. The two watches highlight date windows, the Aqua Terra’s concealed at 6 o’clock, the Submariner in a noticeable situation at 3 o’clock with a Cyclops lens.

Latest age in-house programmed Movements

Once once more, the two competitors profit by the most recent innovation of their particular companies and their programmed developments perform well past the commands of COSC-chronometer affirmation. The Omega Aqua Terra and the Rolex Datejust additionally come with a 5-year warranty.

The Omega Aqua Terra 150m is fitted with type 8900 with Co-Axial escapement and free METAS accreditation as a Master Chronometer (outperforms COSC-chronometry affirmation with its amazing protection from attractive fields of 15,000 gauss). Two heart barrels give a 60-hour power save and stable conveyance of force. Notwithstanding time and date works, the development has a stop-seconds and a time-region work that allows you to set the hour hand freely while traversing time regions. The machine-completed design incorporates angled edges and Geneva waves on the rotor and bridges.

The Rolex Datejust is furnished with the new age Rolex type 3235, a development intended to offer improved exactness, stun and attractive field obstruction, and a redesigned power hold of 70 hours. Covered by 14 licenses, type 3235 utilizations Chronergy escapement, paramagnetic composites and in-house superior lubricants.  The development has acquired ‘Standout Chronometer’ status, an in-house affirmation formulated by Rolex that outperforms exactness paces of the COSC two-fold.

Conclusion: Solid in-house developments in the two cases with against attractive properties and exactness rates that outperform COSC-chronometry guidelines. Omega’s Caliber 8900 has a higher protection from attraction, offers the extra time-region usefulness and can be seen from the caseback. Rolex’s Caliber 3235 flaunts an accuracy pace of – 2/+2 sec/day in the wake of packaging, additionally incorporates stop-seconds usefulness and has 10 hours more force hold than the Omega however is covered up under the strong caseback.


One of the star attractions of the most recent Datejust models was the renewed introduction of the 5-interface Jubilee arm band. This Datejust 41mm model is accessible with the dressier super-graceful Jubilee or the sportier 3-connect Oyster arm band we have here today. The completion of the arm band is totally top notch with smooth, adjusted edges and differentiating silk brushed external connections and thicker splendidly cleaned focal connections. Completely incorporated into the case, the wristband has an ergonomic plan that adjusts impeccably to the wrist. Another component of the Oyster wristband is the collapsing Oysterclasp and the Easylink DIY 5mm comfort expansion link.

The Aqua Terra likewise comes with an assortment of tie alternatives, going from the arm band we have here to elastic, leather and forty or more NATO lashes. Almost certainly motivated by the hyper-comfortable and strong Oyster arm band, the 3-interface wristband of the Aqua Terra is likewise all around got done with cleaned focal connections, brushed external connections and has versatile end connects that permit the watch to settle pleasantly on the wrist.

Conclusion: Two comfortable steel wristbands, one evident forerunner. A bit of leeway of the Oyster wristband over the Aqua Terra is the DIY Easylink fast comfort expansion interface that needs no devices to adjust.

Price and availability

The Omega Aqua Terra 150m steel on steel model – ref. – retails for EUR 5,400 and is generally accessible. The retail cost of the Rolex Datejust 41 – ref. 126334 – is EUR 8,650. Mull over that a Datejust 41 with level steel bezel and an Osyter arm band will retail for EUR 6,750.

When I visited a Rolex retailer here in Madrid, I was told there was a holding up rundown of roughly 9 months for the white metal variant. There were, notwithstanding, a lot of pink and yellow gold Rolesor models on offer.

Conclusion: Two exceptionally solid, similarly coordinated competitors with a value contrast of generally EUR 3,250 for the designs we have here, and EUR 1,350 without the fluted bezel. On the off chance that brand value is critical to you in your last decision, the value contrast won’t be an issue. In the event that brand value is anything but an essential concern, and you like the esthetics of the Aqua Terra, you are getting a ton of watch for a reasonable, fair price.


This is an intense one. As you can see from the comparisons above, the two competitors are unshakable applicants in this Battle of the Daily Beater, and both are all around coordinated on essentially every level plus or minus some minor contrasts. Quality is equivalent, mechanics are extraordinary, execution outperforms COSC guidelines, completes are uncommon, both have a 5-year guarantee – however the look is different.

(Editor’s note: remember that the decision here depends on Rebecca’s own preferences.)

And when the battle reduces to looks, objectivity gets thrown out the window. Albeit the normal side of me needs to accept the Aqua Terra and recognizes that it is probably the most attractive cost for a watch of these qualities, the enthusiastic piece of me needs the Datejust 41.

The Datejust is, in my eyes, the manifestation of the ideal daily watch. Readability is faultless in any light conditions, the dial is straightforward and unassuming, and on the off chance that you will have a date window (and were the innovator of this cool element), why not parade it? I know there are a large number of reasons why individuals scorn date windows, however I accept that in case you will have this usefulness it ought to be prominent and you ought to have the option to peruse it without going after your glasses! Despite the fact that I was somewhat uncomfortable from the start about the fluted bezel, the more I looked, the more I cherished the manner in which it played with the light.

Powerful, energetic, versatile, practical thus great looking… I’m enamored with the Datejust.

Which is your top choice? Also, why? We’d love to hear from you so kindly don’t hesitate to post your comments in the container below.