The other day A. Lange & Söhne sent us two watches for audit and not one, as is ordinary method. The two watches were the new blue dial Lange 1 and Lange 1 Daymatic . While the new blue dials are shocking (truly they are!), we previously covered them and well, without being nonchalant about it, it’s a dial tone and we can’t say significantly more regarding this. What truly interests me, since the time the Lange 1 Daymatic was presented back in 2010, is the manner by which these two watches compare. So we put them close to each other, the notorious hand-wound Lange 1 that has become so significant for the brand and the more up to date programmed kin named Lange 1 Daymatic. How would they compare? What are the distinctions and common focuses? What’s more, what is your favourite?
The Lange 1 was introduced as one of the initial four wristwatches presented by the restored A. Lange & Söhne in 1994. Together with the Arkade, the Saxonia and the Tourbillon “Pour le Mérite”, it impacted the world forever, and particularly the Lange 1, which turned into the “ambassador” face of the restored German brand. Showing hours and minutes in an off-focus dial, an enormous date and the force save of the physically wound development, it doesn’t really qualify as an exemplary dress watch.
However, because of its general exemplary style and limited extents, I wouldn’t be timid to wear the Lange 1 as a dress watch (particularly in yellow or white gold with a silver dial). Since the hours and minutes sub-dial is on the left half of the dial, often slipping under your sleeve, we could even contend that it’s an ideal dress watch as dress watches are intended to be prudent about the time.
The genuine inquiry isn’t truly whether the Lange 1 or the Lange 1 Daymatic are wonderful dress watches, however which is the model to get? Whether you incline toward the symbol, the main, the first Lange 1 or its naturally wound kin, the Daymatic. For this, let’s first examine a portion of the specs and how they compare.
Case and design
The Lange 1 estimates 38.5mm in width and is 9.8mm thick (or dainty), while the Lange 1 Daymatic estimates 39.5mm in measurement with a 10.4mm thickness. This implies that the Daymatic is 1mm bigger in width and 0.6mm thicker. It seems like basically nothing, however on the wrist, you can see the distinction. On my wrist (around 19cm), the two watches wear charmingly, and the distinction in size is not really observable. I can envision that on more modest wrists, this insignificant distinction will be more noticeable – yet then once more, it will stay negligible. Let’s say that the Daymatic has a somewhat more current “presence” and the Lange 1 holds the exemplary extents of the debut model of 1994. In any case, we’re talking subtleties here, particularly since the bezels and drags aren’t different.
The completing of the case is additionally equivalent on the two watches. Cleaned bezels and hauls, straight brushed casebands, cleaned line around the caseback and round brushed caseback… Again, essentially no distinctions here. We have similar shapes for the hauls (with Lange’s regular break when the drags meet the case and an incline on the outside side), the crown has a similar shape and plan (despite the fact that the Daymatic is somewhat bigger, to meet with the “thicker” case) and there’s a similar pusher at 10 o’clock to change the date. By and by, insufficient here to obviously separate these two watches. Both are similarly delightful, similarly formed, similarly rich and restrained… and similarly Lange!
Having with me two of the recently presented “blue editions” makes things simpler for comparison matters. Both have a 18k white case and a blue dial. On the photographs, you can see that the lashes are somewhat extraordinary, with the Daytmatic fitted with a more “squarish” and more cushioned tie. However the tones are equivalent to is the quality. Concerning the buckle… Well, you can undoubtedly figure. They both have a similar pin lock in white gold.
So, after those initial 700 words, we haven’t truly come to any resolutions. Except for 1mm to a great extent, and a marginally extraordinary lash, the two watches can’t truly be separated. Nonetheless, this is going to change with the dials, the presentations and the mechanics that drive them. Also, this works out positively past the programmed/hand-wound difference.
Dial and display
Both the Lange 1 and the Lange 1 Daymatic we had for this survey were fitted with blue dials – these are important for a one-year-just creation run, so if you’re intrigued by one, be quick. There is no distinction regarding shadings and treatment, and the two watches have a dim blue dial with an electrifies treatment, which creates a metallic tone – a particularly energetic tone of blue.
One close to another, when looking intently at the dials of the Lange 1 and the Lange 1 Daymatic, you quickly detect that one is the identical representation or twin of the other. All the signs are on the contrary side of the dial. The fundamental distinction between these two come from the extra complication. While the Lange 1 highlights a force save marker (an undeniable decision for a hand-wound watch), the Daymatic replaces it with a day-of-the-week pointer – a force hold doesn’t bode well on a programmed watch. Notwithstanding, the situation of this extra sign is additionally reflected and includes a similar hand and a similar curved track.
Some other contrasts are observable on the dial of these watches. The enormous date is indistinguishable, the little seconds haven’t changed a piece, yet there are two significant contrasts. The first is the style of the hours and minutes counter. While altogether snailed on the Lange 1, the Daymatic has two distinct surfaces, as just the outskirts is recessed and snailed, while the middle is raised and level. Likewise, despite the fact that the lists are the equivalent – a combination of white gold applied Roman numerals and jewel molded markers – their position is marginally unique. Therefore, the Daymatic feels more stuffed, more compact, a smidgen more occupied than the Lange 1, which is more moderate. Some will lean toward the perfect Lange 1, some will favor the more complex, perhaps more easygoing Daymatic layout.
The last (yet truly not least) distinction concerns the hands. Surely, the shape is “Lange-esque” on the two watches. However, there is one significant contrast: the Daymatic has hours, minutes and day hands that are glowing, while on the Lange 1, the hands are plain cleaned gold. Does it have an effect? Indeed, a ton really. This is the thing that, as far as I might be concerned, separates the two watches – as far as configuration as well as chiefly as far as work. One holds the ultra-elegance of the debut model, the other makes a couple of concessions to common sense and offers a less severe look – and that, in view of the little consideration of iridescent paint on all fours extraordinary format for the hours/minutes sub-dial.
So currently, how do these watches look once they’ve lashed on the wrist? A significant factor with such watches is the means by which they cooperate with formal attire. Here again, the jobs of the two watches are clear, due to the reflected showcases. In the event that the Lange 1 loves to be circumspect and timid, by concealing when the watch is somewhat positioned under the sleeve, the Lange 1 Daymatic again makes concessions to common sense with a showcase that is obvious, in any event, when the watch isn’t completely visible…
As you can see, when the Daymatic is worn, with just the correct side of the dial obvious, the time actually remains showed – while on the Lange 1, all you’ll see is the date and the leftover force. One plays it cautiously, the other is more business-situated. It isn’t rich to take a gander at the time during a gathering but… now and again you need to counsel the time. So better do it in style with a trace of discretion.
The same distinction of livelihood is plainly noticeable on the development side. One is hand-wound and dedicated to the debut Lange 1. The second is programmed and adds reasonableness and a specific genuine feelings of serenity to its wearer (or if nothing else, the capacity to disregard the watch and its winding). Two unique developments for two diverse philosophies.
If the two developments bring about a general equivalent (yet reflected) show, the best approach to accomplish this is altogether extraordinary. On one side is the Lange 1, outfitted with a manual development with “Doppelfederhaus” – a not-so-lovely word to show the presence of a twofold origin. This development, despite the fact that it looks natural, is completely new, compared to the type that prepared the Lange 1 out of 1994 – it was presented close by the unobtrusive facelift done by A. Lange & Söhne on its symbol in 2015 (incl. unobtrusive changes on the bezel and the engravings). A more critical glance at this development uncovers significantly more current mechanics, still with a natural look. As we clarified in this comparison of the old and new Lange 1 , it has a pristine engineering (somewhat bigger yet somewhat more slender), another in-house balance wheel, a new date system and overhauled decoration.
Still, this calibre L121.1 holds the 72h force save and precisely the same presentation as the debut model. The enrichment is first class and the appearance of this development is about the German School of Watchmaking – 3/4 plate in untreated German silver, dainty ribbings, screwed gold chatons and an engraved equilibrium cockerel. This development is wonderfully designed and in fact incredible yet it is rather attentive and “shy” (it doesn’t uncover quite a bit of its innards). Thus, and as a result of the hand-wound design, it seems to me like a connoisseur’s movement.
On the other hand, we have the development of the Lange 1 Daymatic. As a matter of first importance, this type L021.1 is self-winding – yet you’ve most likely speculated that as of now. What to say about this development? Indeed, don’t think of it as a straightforward advancement. It has nothing to do with the hand-twisted development of the Lange 1. Truth be told, it is really a lovely complex development, comprising no less than 426 sections and 67 gems (truly, that’s a great deal). It includes the in-house balance wheel with eccentric balancing loads and an in-house hairspring as well. The force save is “only” 50 hours, which is less significant on account of a programmed watch.
What is significant is that this development is substantially more “flamboyant” than the one in the Lange 1. In addition to the fact that it is outfitted for every day use (sign of the day, position of the hours/minutes sub-dial, programmed) in any case, as a result of its more complex format and the presence of a gold-hued rotor and more complex scaffolds, it requires less horological development to be perceived. My point is that this development is wonderful and engaging, in any event, for non-experienced individuals. The development of the Lange 1, then again, may require some more prepared eyes to uncover its concealed excellence. The two developments have gotten a similar tender loving care yet the visual outcome is altogether different.
So what to close of this next to each other comparison between the Lange 1 and the Lange 1 Daymatic? My point is that we are before two watches that are close in style yet profoundly unique in way of thinking. Everything lies in the subtleties, yet eventually, these subtleties set the two watches apart.
On one side, we have the notorious Lange 1, a watch that has all the inequity, qualification, class, polish and mechanical excellence that you can anticipate from A. Lange & Söhne. It is splendid in each and every viewpoint and its defects make its appeal – if at any point there are a few blemishes on this watch. In any case, thinking about the caution of this watch, its non-abundance and its rather timid development, it is a watch that I’d recommend to more develop devotees. The Lange 1 is a watch that will complement a generally strong collection.
Even on the off chance that it is the identical representation of the Lange 1, the Daymatic is naturally unique. Absolutely, it conveys a similar measure of polish, ageless allure and class, yet with a trace of innovation and common sense. In view of its more sane showcase, due to the sign of the day, the presence of radiant hands and predominantly, a self-winding development, it would be the watch to recommend to somebody who means to wear this watch consistently. Not that the Lange 1 can’t convey a great deal of delight here, yet the Daymatic is basically better in this point of view. It is simpler to secure and the development has a greater amount of that “wow effect” that you anticipate from such top of the line watches. This is the place where these two “non-indistinguishable twins” differentiate.
Yet, common sense and a complex development come at a cost at A. Lange & Söhne and the Daymatic requires an extra EUR 7,000 compared to the Lange 1 (EUR 38,700 for the Daymatic versus EUR 31,700 for the Lange 1). This, combined with the undebatable quality of the Lange 1, may play for the hand-wound variant. Regardless, there are no off-base decisions, just preferences.
More subtleties on www.alange-soehne.com .